GitHub dominates software development the way Google dominates search: with such comprehensive market share that most developers never consider whether an alternative could exist. But a Helsinki-based startup called Tangled is building one anyway -- and it just raised EUR 3.8 million in seed funding to do it.
The round was led by byFounders, the Copenhagen-based fund that backs Nordic and Baltic founders, with participation from Bain Capital Crypto and Antler. Angel investors include Thomas Dohmke -- yes, the CEO of GitHub -- along with Avery Pennarun (CEO of Tailscale) and Marten Mickos, the veteran open-source executive who led MySQL and Eucalyptus.
When the CEO of GitHub invests in a company building a GitHub alternative, you should pay attention. It suggests that even the people who run the incumbent platform recognize that the centralized model has structural limitations -- and that a federated, community-governed approach to code collaboration could represent the next evolution of how software gets built.
Built on the AT Protocol: Why Decentralization Matters for Code
Tangled is built on the AT Protocol -- the same decentralized framework that powers Bluesky, the Twitter/X alternative. The protocol enables federation: multiple independent servers that can communicate with each other while allowing users to retain ownership of their data and identity. Applied to code hosting, this means developers can run their own Tangled instances, host repositories on servers they control, and still collaborate seamlessly with developers on other instances.
If that sounds abstract, consider the practical implications. On GitHub, a single corporate decision -- a terms of service change, a pricing adjustment, a moderation policy -- affects every developer on the platform simultaneously. There is no exit without significant friction. With Tangled's federated model, communities can self-govern, set their own policies, and migrate between servers without losing their work or connections.
The platform supports features that developer teams expect: stacked pull requests, integrated continuous integration, social discovery tools, and code review workflows. But it layers these on a foundation that no centralized platform can replicate: genuine data sovereignty and community self-governance.
Tangled vs. the Code Hosting Landscape
Platform | Model | Data Ownership | Self-Hosting | Founded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tangled | Federated (AT Protocol) | User-owned | Yes (interconnected) | 2025 |
GitHub | Centralized (Microsoft) | Platform-controlled | Enterprise only | 2008 |
GitLab | Centralized / Self-hosted | Varies | Yes (isolated) | 2011 |
Codeberg | Centralized (nonprofit) | Platform-hosted | No | 2019 |
Gitea | Self-hosted (isolated) | User-owned | Yes (isolated) | 2016 |
The critical distinction is in the federation column. GitLab and Gitea offer self-hosting, but each instance is an island -- there is no built-in mechanism for cross-instance collaboration. Tangled's AT Protocol foundation means self-hosted instances can discover, interact with, and contribute to repositories on other instances natively. It is the difference between running your own email server (which can still send messages to anyone) and running a private wiki that nobody else can access.
The GitHub CEO's Angel Check: Signal or Hedged Bet?
Thomas Dohmke's investment in Tangled is the kind of move that generates more questions than answers. As GitHub CEO, Dohmke leads a platform with over 100 million developers and deep integration into Microsoft's enterprise ecosystem. Investing in a federated alternative could be read as a personal hedge, a genuine belief in protocol-level innovation, or simply an angel investor spreading bets across the developer tools landscape.
The most likely explanation is the most nuanced one: Dohmke recognizes that centralization creates fragility, and that a healthy developer ecosystem benefits from multiple approaches to code collaboration. GitHub's dominance is not threatened by a seed-stage Finnish startup with thousands of users. But the underlying technology -- federated identity, community governance, protocol-based interoperability -- could influence how the entire industry evolves over the next decade.
The other angel investors reinforce this thesis. Avery Pennarun built Tailscale on the premise that networking should be decentralized and user-controlled. Marten Mickos spent his career proving that open-source models can build billion-dollar businesses. These are not speculators. They are builders who see federation as a structural improvement over centralization.
From Helsinki to Global: Tangled's Growth Trajectory
Co-founders Anirudh Oppiliappan and Akshay Oppiliappan launched Tangled in 2025, and the platform has already grown to thousands of users and thousands of repositories in its first year. The brothers have described their vision as building the best code forge ever -- infrastructure for the next generation of open-source development, whether that involves hundreds of developers building artisanal libraries or a single developer orchestrating a hundred AI agents.
The AI agent angle is particularly timely. As AI-powered coding assistants like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Devin become more sophisticated, the volume of code being generated is exploding. A federated platform that can handle distributed, agent-driven development workflows without bottlenecking through a single corporate platform could become essential infrastructure.
The EUR 3.8 million in seed funding will accelerate platform development, grow the global user community, and build out the team in Helsinki. For a developer tools company, the path to revenue typically runs through developer adoption first and enterprise monetization second -- a pattern that GitHub itself pioneered.
byFounders Doubles Down on Nordic Developer Infrastructure
byFounders' lead position in this round reflects a broader thesis about the Nordic region's role in developer infrastructure. The Nordics have produced an outsized share of foundational open-source projects -- Linux (Finland), MySQL (Sweden/Finland), and countless others -- and the region's engineering culture emphasizes the kind of collaborative, community-driven development that Tangled is building for.
Bain Capital Crypto's participation signals something additional: the investment community sees AT Protocol-based applications as a category with significant growth potential beyond Bluesky. If federated protocols become the default infrastructure for social applications, the companies building specialized tools on top of them -- whether for social networking, code collaboration, or other domains -- could capture substantial value.
GitHub changed how the world builds software. Tangled is betting that the next change comes from decentralizing the platform itself -- turning code collaboration from a service you rent from Microsoft into a protocol you own and govern. EUR 3.8 million is a modest war chest for that ambition. But with the GitHub CEO's endorsement, a growing user base, and a protocol-level thesis that resonates with the open-source community, Tangled is one of the most interesting developer tools bets to emerge from the Nordics in years.
